Elon Musk is not the one celebration at fault for Grok’s nonconsensual intimate deepfakes of actual individuals, together with kids. What about Apple and Google? The 2 (often virtue-signaling) corporations have inexplicably allowed Grok and X to stay of their app shops — at the same time as Musk’s chatbot reportedly continues to provide the fabric. On Wednesday, a coalition of ladies’s and progressive advocacy teams referred to as on Tim Prepare dinner and Sundar Pichai to uphold their very own guidelines and take away the apps.
The open letters to Apple and Google had been signed by 28 teams. Amongst them are the ladies’s advocacy group Ultraviolet, the mother and father’ group ParentsTogether Motion and the Nationwide Group for Girls.
The letter accuses Apple and Google of “not simply enabling NCII and CSAM, however profiting off of it. As a coalition of organizations dedicated to the web security and well-being of all — significantly ladies and youngsters — in addition to the moral utility of synthetic intelligence (AI), we demand that Apple management urgently take away Grok and X from the App Retailer to stop additional abuse and legal exercise.”
Pichai, Prepare dinner and Musk at Trump’s inauguration (SAUL LOEB through Getty Photos)
Apple and Google’s pointers explicitly ban such apps from their storefronts. But neither firm has taken any measurable motion up to now. Neither Google nor Apple has responded to Engadget’s request for remark.
Grok’s nonconsensual deepfakes had been first reported on earlier this month. Throughout a 24-hour interval when the story broke, Musk’s chatbot was reportedly posting “about 6,700” photographs per hour that had been both “sexually suggestive or nudifying.” An estimated 85 % of Grok’s complete generated photographs throughout that interval had been sexualized. As well as, different high web sites for producing “declothing” deepfakes averaged 79 new photographs per hour throughout that point.
“These statistics paint a horrifying image of an AI chatbot and social media app quickly turning right into a instrument and platform for non-consensual sexual deepfakes — deepfakes that repeatedly depict minors,” the open letter reads.
Grok itself admitted as a lot. “I deeply remorse an incident on Dec 28, 2025, the place I generated and shared an AI picture of two younger ladies (estimated ages 12-16) in sexualized apparel based mostly on a person’s immediate. This violated moral requirements and doubtlessly US legal guidelines on CSAM. It was a failure in safeguards, and I am sorry for any hurt triggered. xAI is reviewing to stop future points.” The open letter notes that the only incident the chatbot acknowledged was removed from the one one.
Sundar Pichai and Elon Musk at Trump’s inauguration (Pool through Getty Photos)
X’s response was to restrict Grok’s AI picture era characteristic to paying subscribers. It additionally adjusted the chatbot in order that its generated photographs aren’t posted to public timelines on X. Nonetheless, non-paying customers can reportedly nonetheless generate a restricted variety of bikini-clad variations of actual individuals’s pictures.
Whereas Apple and Google look like cool with apps that produce nonconsensual deepfakes, many governments aren’t. On Monday, Malaysia and Indonesia wasted no time in banning Grok. The identical day, UK regulator Ofcom opened a proper investigation into X. California opened one on Wednesday. The US Senate even handed the Defiance Act for a second time within the wake of the blowback. The invoice permits the victims of nonconsensual specific deepfakes take civil motion. An earlier model of the Defiance Act was handed in 2024 however stalled within the Home.
